Home
Analysis
BIBI Results Map
BIBI Results Table
About the BIBI Scoring System
BIBI Scoring Variations
Taxa Attributes Used in BIBI Scoring
Monitoring Projects
Adopt-A-Stream Foundation
Jim Creek BIBI Study
City of Bainbridge Island
Water Quality and Flow Monitoring Program
City of Bellevue
Macroinvertebrates in Bellevue creeks
City of Bellingham
City of Bellingham Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Program
City of Federal Way
Macroinvertebrate Sampling Program
City of Issaquah
Aquatic Resources Monitoring Program
City of Kirkland
Benthic Invertebrate Monitoring
City of Lake Forest Park
Lake Forest Park Benthic Invertebrates
City of Redmond
Annual Benthic Monitoring Program
City of Seattle
Project Evaluation
Status & Trends
Clallam County
Streamkeepers of Clallam County Biological Monitoring
King County - DNRP
Ambient Monitoring
Mercer Island
UPD
WRIA 08 Wadable Streams Survey
King County - Roads
ESA Water Quality / Macroinvertebrate
Macroinvertebrate CIP Support
Kitsap County
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biological Monitoring Program
Kitsap County Stream Team Benthic Invertebrate Monitoring
Skokomish Tribal Nation
Skokomish River Basin Benthic Invertebrates
Snohomish County
Ambient
Thurston County
Thurston County Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring
Washington State Department of Ecology
Status and Trends Monitoring for Watershed Health and Salmon Recovery - Wadeable Streams
Login
About Us
Site Map
Login
Puget Sound Stream Benthos
Ambient Project, Snohomish County
Snohomish County has identified three goals for its water quality monitoring program: 1) evaluate whether best management practices or habitat restoration actions are effective at specific sites, 2) assess the current status of stream sites in the region, and 3) identify regional trends in stream condition. An efficient sampling design that would support all three goals involves replicate sampling at targeted sites and single samples from regional status and trend monitoring sites. Assuming an annual sampling effort of approximately 50 macroinvertebrate samples, 18 are allocated to targeted sampling sites (6sites x 3 replicates) and 15 samples each for both status and trend monitoring. For status and trend monitoring, sites are grouped into three geographic regions to simplify field sampling. Within each area, 15 randomly selected sites are sampled each year to assess status. For trend monitoring, 15 sites are randomly selected only during the first year of sampling then those same sites are revisited every third year.
Contact: Steve Britsch, s.britsch@co.snohomish.wa.us, 425-388-3464 ext 4668